Piece Corps
New member
Other than the number of occupants at the address, the ages of those occupants, and the sex of those occupants, you are not required by law to answer anything else. And since we have a corrupt pseudo-agency running the census (ACORN), it would behoove all of us to resist this to the utmost. Use the text below, and find an attorney (which shouldn't be a problem at all) who will file a lawsuit against the government if you are threatened in any way with a fine or worse.
I think that when the government is faced with a couple hundred thousand lawsuits, in every state of the Union, they'll think twice about their attempt to force unwarranted personal information from us. I don't know about the rest of you, but most of that form will be returned blank.
Link Removed
Legal Authority to Ask Intrusive Questions Not Present
This Constitution and the Laws made in Pursuance thereof... shall be the
supreme Law of the Land...all Judges shall be bound thereby...any Thing...to
the Contrary notwithstanding.
Article VI, Clause 2, of the Constitution of the United States of America
(1789).
The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form
and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void. Unconstitutional
law bears no power to enforce, it purports to settle as if it never existed,
for unconstitutionality dates from the enactment of such a law and not such
time as branded in an open court of law. It confers no rights; it imposes no
duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal
contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed. No courts
are bound to uphold it and no persons are bound to obey it.
16 Am Jur 256.
The Fourth and Fifth Amendments were described in Boyd v. United States, 116
U.S. 616, 630, as protection against all governmental invasions ....of the
sanctity of a man's home and the privacies of life.'' We recently referred
[381 U.S. 479, 485] in Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 656, to the Fourth
Amendment as creating a ....right to privacy, no less important than any
other right carefully and particularly reserved to the people.''
GRISWOLD v. CONNECTICUT, 381 U.S. 479 (1965)
Declaration To Make To Census Takers
"I hereby affirm that the provisions of Title 13 ....requiring'' me to
disclose my race, personal financial data, birthdate, or any other personal,
private information to the Bureau of the Census, an agency of the United
States government; constitutes an unreasonable, unwarranted search of my
person, house, papers, and/or effects; and a governmental invasion of the
sanctity of my home and the privacies of life. As such, these provisions
violate the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution, and are thus wholly
void and I am not bound to obey them.
I have completed the only those sections of the Census form pertaining to
the Constitutionally-mandated actual enumeration, as follows:
1. The actual number of people living at the address printed on the form,
excluding untaxed Native Americans;
2. Age of each person in accordance with US Const. Amendment XIV, Section 2.
3. Sex of each person, in accordance with US Const. Amendment XIV, Section 2
I have thus fulfilled my obligation to the attainment of the actual
enumeration of the populace of the United States.
Any fine or other sanction that is levied by any office or organization
stemming from the unconstitutional provisions of Title 13 in connection with
my response to this or any other Census-related questioning will be
challenged in a court of law."
I think that when the government is faced with a couple hundred thousand lawsuits, in every state of the Union, they'll think twice about their attempt to force unwarranted personal information from us. I don't know about the rest of you, but most of that form will be returned blank.
Link Removed
Last edited by a moderator: