Ceicei
New member
Thank you. Your link is much appreciated!Check out this page for size /stat comparisons
Link Removed
- Ceicei
Thank you. Your link is much appreciated!Check out this page for size /stat comparisons
Link Removed
In lieu of the P250, I would consider the P229 DAK. Ditto to all the comments about the reliability, accuracy, and durability of the Sig. It's second to none. For both guns, the DAO trigger is a GREAT trigger. No external safety to mess with, no decocking lever = simplified critical actions in a bind, and it is so smooth. Now, the reasons for the 229:
The reason for the 229 over the 250 is the additional weight of the 229. According to Sig, the 229 is 32 oz with a loaded mag, the fullsize 250 is 29 oz, and the compact is 25 oz. The weight difference may not seem like a lot on paper, but it does make a significant difference when it comes to absorbing recoil. I feel much more comfortable shooting the midsize 229 than most full size autos because of the stainless steel slide and frame. There is a tangible heft to the gun that breeds confidence when it comes to recoil - ESPECIALLY when I hand it to my 100 lb wife, one of my kids, or anyone I've taken to the range to help learn about shooting a handgun (if you aren't friendly to all the newbs you see at the range, you're wrong). I'm not a big guy (5'9" 155#), but I do fine carrying it concealed. If you carry in a handbag or purse, the weight/bulk isn't as much of a factor.
Lastly, rather than the M&P, consider a Springfield XD or XDM. I've fired both (and plenty of Glocks), and I've been impressed with how good the ergonomics of the gun are. I put less effort into shooting an XD really well than I have to put in for Glocks or the M&P (which has some intangible that makes me not like it - this only counts for me). Still, I return to the Sig because I feel as at home holding it as I do my wife's hand.
Best of luck!