If everyone carried openly, a criminal would simply visit various stores and when he finally entered one where he didn't see any weapons, he would rob that one. Now what typically happens in Tennessee is the criminal waits until there are no customers in the store to commit a robbery. Why? (1) he probably doesn't want witnesses (2) he doesn't know whether or not customers might be armed and really doesn't want to take a chance.
DING DING DING we have a winner! That is exactly why we carry openly! It deters the criminal before the crime is ever committed! Would you rather he take the chance you are not armed, forcing you to protect yourself in a reaction of life or death? Not only did the open carry stop the same crime from happening, they did so without having to have all their property confiscated, go through the legal system, get scrutinized by everyone, and much more. The criminals don't want to die, therefore, they will leave me alone, because there is no chances with me, he knows 100% I will fight back and I have the means to do so. That is 100000x more effective of a deterrent than the 50/50 chance I may or may not be carrying a hidden firearm.
Scenarios:
A: 99.9% chance you will have to kill or be killed, because there is an armed citizen.
B: 50/50 chance you will have to kill or be killed, because there might be a citizen hiding a firearm.
C: slim to none if you go into a store with no one but the store owner, that has a no gun's sign/policy.
Which scenario would you pick? If you didn't choose A, that is why we open carry. If you didn't choose B, that is why people carry concealed. If you chose A over B, you are a dangerous person to everyone in society. (not that you are specifically a bad guy, but you as in a general "bad guy" reference)
>>