CNBC interviwed my brother regarding the AR15

hogwylde

New member
Here's a copy/paste of his Facebook post:

------------------

OK... so here's the story about how I was chosen to be on CNBC's "AR-15 project." They decided to do a 1-hour special on the AR-15, since it's the lightning rod of the "gun debate" and it's the target for being banned. CNBC wanted to present both sides, including featuring "normal" people who own AR-15s.

At the production meeting, they were discussing finding "normal" people who own AR-15s. One producer said, "We need to find someone like.... a DENTIST." So, they Googled "AR-15 dentist." And, they found my blog article. They contacted me by email and asked if I'd be interested in being interviewed. MOI? Interested in being on TV?? Naaaaaaaaaaaaa! Not my style! ;)

So, they flew down to Florida and spent some time shooting (video) me at my office being a dentist. Then they came to my son's hockey practice and shot video of me being a "hockey dad." That was yesterday.

Today, we went to the range. Before arriving, they asked me if I could recruit other AR-15 owners who were "normal" regular people. As it happens, I knew a couple of my patients who did, and they were happy to participate. We spent about 5 hours at the range doing interviews and shooting video footage of us shooting our AR-15s.

The reporter who interviewed us is a real pro. And, he did not lob up softballs for us. He hit us hard with questions... questions that represent what the antis are asking. But, I expected that, and I stood my ground with factual, unemotional counterpoints. It was all off-the-cuff for me, of course. But, I like thinking and speaking on my feet. I think I did pretty well, and all those who observed told me I did. My patients / friends also did very well.

It will be very interesting to see what parts are edited out vs. what makes the final cut.

Overall, it was actually fun. It felt good to have the opportunity to present "our side" of the debate. Ultimately, with editing, my efforts might be for naught. But, if ANY part of what I did makes it through and has a positive effect....that's a good thing.

I took my role quite seriously, as I believe it is an issue of utmost importance. It is, quite literally, an issue of life or death. If there is one instinct that is universal among living things on this Earth, it is the survival instinct... self-defense. The same people that would decry the de-tusking of elephants and the de-fanging of tigers (for the "safety" of humans) oddly (and hypocritically) support disarming fellow humans. It makes no sense to me. It defies the laws of nature.

Finally, there are millions and millions of gun owners, JUST LIKE ME, who have never committed a crime and never will. The notion of punishing law abiding citizens as a way to "prevent" crime is simply a vacuous attempt at assuaging the fears of the people (while fanning those fears at the same time). "We MUST do SOMETHING. (even if it's the wrong thing)" I say NO. We must do the RIGHT thing... always.

Thomas Jefferson said, "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences of too much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it."

We must NOT infringe upon the freedoms of citizens in the name of preventing criminals from perpetrating their evil deeds.

BTW, this project is much bigger than just my 2 friends and me. They're going all over the country doing this. They expect the special to air around the middle of April.
 
Would love to see the final version of it. When will it air and what station? If CNBC has their own station, I have not watched it before.
 
I hope it does not happen but don't surprised if the final product has nothing in common with the interviews you gave, their questions for you were hard balls and they will now formulate softballs based on your statements for the antis, CNBC is an NBC/Comcast outlet and they certainly are not know for their fairness or objectivity
 
I hope it does not happen but don't surprised if the final product has nothing in common with the interviews you gave, their questions for you were hard balls and they will now formulate softballs based on your statements for the antis, CNBC is an NBC/Comcast outlet and they certainly are not know for their fairness or objectivity
Having been interviewed by news people, I'd say you will be right.
 
I too have been interviewed by news people, the stories that end up in the final view is too often very different from what you might think. My interviews have had nothing to do with politics, had to do with local emergencies, the out come is the same. The final edition will be what the editors believe will sell the best to the viewing public.
 
Been interviewed for various reasons and more often than not, when I see it I think "That's not what I said!". Hope this comes out well.
 
Awesome, so where you nerves and I know that you gave us good guys and gals an A+ I would love to see it.
 
I don't know if it is feasable, .would be nice to have a copy of the original unedited taping. This way if they edit it "unfavorably" it could be posted all over the internet to discredit the antis.
 
I feel the less you say to any news media about your AR or AKs the better everyone ends up being. I have not found any major news media that was not trying to get points with the Obama anti firearm bunch. Every time I see any story on T.V. about the AR&AKs all I see is someone firing and firing and firing them. Point they are making is them AR&AK shoot many many many time, just see this for yourself.
 
Well, good on your brother for having the guts to speak for what he believes in publicly. Unfortunately, unless you have had professional media training (even then, you can still be "gotcha'd"), it can be astonishing how badly some of these kinds of interviews turn out, especially if the interviewer and editor have an agenda and "story line narrative" they are trying to push. Bits can be spliced together out of sequence, comments edited short and taken out of context, etc., etc. A request for an unedited copy of the interview, if refused, tells you something right there.
 
the only one I did not agree with was yager and the only reason was he walk out of the interview he should have stayed and gave his side I feel we should have the right to own one but as you all know new York banned them
 
An NRA representative just contacted (left voice mail) my brother inviting him to speak at one of their meetings.
 

New Threads

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
49,523
Messages
610,661
Members
74,992
Latest member
RedDotArmsTraining
Back
Top