Can we now shoot the NRA and everyone who defends them!?

_Anthony_

New member
CREDIT: JOE NEWBY
Link Removed

Where is the CNN attention of this?

John Cobaruvvias, the Texas Democratic Party leader who issued a tweet advocating violence against NRA members, told Houston ABC affiliate KTRK Monday that his call to shoot supporters of the pro-gun group was not a death threat.

"Can we now shoot the #NRA and everyone who defends them?" he tweeted after the Connecticut school shootings.

"I think my emotions got the best of me on this one. I don't think it was the right thing to do. And that's just my personal opinion, I don't think it was the right thing," he said.

Cobaruvvias deleted the offensive tweet and issued an apology of sorts, but his original message was captured and posted at Big Jolly Politics.

"My apologies to those I offended concerning the #nra. My emotions on the subject got the better of me. It didn't help," he said.

Bryan Preston of PJ Media, however, says that he doesn't believe Cobaruvvias' apology is "heartfelt" since he called the group a terrorist organization in another tweet the very same day.

Cobaruvvias also posted a message on his Facebook page saying that supporters of the group " need to [be] wiped off the face of the earth."

Preston also said that Cobaruvvias' "public threat against so many elected officials could constitute a terroristic threat," since a number of elected officials, including the "governor, both of its senators, all of its other statewide officials and most elected members of the state’s legislature" support the NRA.

Eric Dondero observed that the "Bay Area where Cobarruvias lives, borders Ron Paul's 14th congressional district, and Paul is a Lifetime NRA member."

A post at Rhymes with Right says that Cobarruvias has a history of controversial statements and over-the-top behavior, including "racist, sexist, homophobic and anti-disabled hate speech against his opponents and threatened/encouraged acts of violence against political opponents."

The state Democratic Party had very little to say about Cobaruvvias' tweet.

"The Democratic Party never condones violence in our society," the state Party told Examiner in an email, and told KTRK that "everyone wishes they could take back something they've said."

No doubt, if a Republican issued a tweet that suggested supporters of a liberal cause be shot, the entire Democrat-media complex would be calling for blood until the offender resigned. A Democratic Party leader, however, apparently can get by with an "apology."
 
"The Democratic Party never condones violence in our society," <---- Yeah, they just enable it by ensuring that only the criminals, and politicians, have the means to defend themselves.

"Can we now shoot the #NRA and everyone who defends them?" he tweeted after the Connecticut school shootings. <--- Imagine if someone tweeted about shooting him?
 
Is this clown an Islamic extremist? Death threats, and no charges filed? An apology is all that was offered?

I'm surprised someone hasn't filed charges.

It looks like being a Democrat has its perks.

I believe this guy should be limited to two terms; one in office, the other in prison.
 
The media will ignore the threats made. If a republican did the same thing the news media would be all over it like stink on crap.
 
"The Democratic Party never condones violence in our society," <---- Yeah, they just enable it by ensuring that only the criminals, and politicians, have the means to defend themselves.

"Can we now shoot the #NRA and everyone who defends them?" he tweeted after the Connecticut school shootings. <--- Imagine if someone tweeted about shooting him?

Democrat politicians are criminals.

imho, just sayin'.
 
My response to that imbecile:

"You want to shoot NRA members? Gee Johnny, do you need my address? I'm your huckleberry..."
 
Needless to say, the NRA hasn't been very popular ever since the Sandy Hook massacre. The fact that it has virtually disappeared from Facebook, Twitter, and even its own website hasn't helped its cause either. But for anti-NRA foes to advocate violence makes them no better than the Great Satan they claim to be opposing. Say what you will about the NRA, but it has never advocated violence against those who oppose it.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
 
My response to that imbecile:

"You want to shoot NRA members? Gee Johnny, do you need my address? I'm your huckleberry..."

If we all tweeted him our addresses and said "here we are, come shoot us." One of us would maybe MAYBE have one car pull up and turn around in our driveways.

It's typical liberal hate talk. And it's just talk, meant to intimidate. There's no actual force behind those words.
 
Needless to say, the NRA hasn't been very popular ever since the Sandy Hook massacre. The fact that it has virtually disappeared from Facebook, Twitter, and even its own website hasn't helped its cause either. But for anti-NRA foes to advocate violence makes them no better than the Great Satan they claim to be opposing. Say what you will about the NRA, but it has never advocated violence against those who oppose it.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

The NRA has never advocated violence against anyone. The only thing we advocate is the right to bear arms. Freedom from tyranny, the preservation of the second amendment, so that this great nation will never fall. And of course, protecting your loved ones.
 
CREDIT: JOE NEWBY
Link Removed

Where is the CNN attention of this?

John Cobaruvvias, the Texas Democratic Party leader who issued a tweet advocating violence against NRA members, told Houston ABC affiliate KTRK Monday that his call to shoot supporters of the pro-gun group was not a death threat.

"Can we now shoot the #NRA and everyone who defends them?" he tweeted after the Connecticut school shootings.

"I think my emotions got the best of me on this one. I don't think it was the right thing to do. And that's just my personal opinion, I don't think it was the right thing," he said.

Cobaruvvias deleted the offensive tweet and issued an apology of sorts, but his original message was captured and posted at Big Jolly Politics.

"My apologies to those I offended concerning the #nra. My emotions on the subject got the better of me. It didn't help," he said.

Bryan Preston of PJ Media, however, says that he doesn't believe Cobaruvvias' apology is "heartfelt" since he called the group a terrorist organization in another tweet the very same day.

Cobaruvvias also posted a message on his Facebook page saying that supporters of the group " need to [be] wiped off the face of the earth."

Preston also said that Cobaruvvias' "public threat against so many elected officials could constitute a terroristic threat," since a number of elected officials, including the "governor, both of its senators, all of its other statewide officials and most elected members of the state’s legislature" support the NRA.

Eric Dondero observed that the "Bay Area where Cobarruvias lives, borders Ron Paul's 14th congressional district, and Paul is a Lifetime NRA member."

A post at Rhymes with Right says that Cobarruvias has a history of controversial statements and over-the-top behavior, including "racist, sexist, homophobic and anti-disabled hate speech against his opponents and threatened/encouraged acts of violence against political opponents."

The state Democratic Party had very little to say about Cobaruvvias' tweet.

"The Democratic Party never condones violence in our society," the state Party told Examiner in an email, and told KTRK that "everyone wishes they could take back something they've said."

No doubt, if a Republican issued a tweet that suggested supporters of a liberal cause be shot, the entire Democrat-media complex would be calling for blood until the offender resigned. A Democratic Party leader, however, apparently can get by with an "apology."

That a$$hat does know we're armed..uh..right?
 
If we all tweeted him our addresses and said "here we are, come shoot us." One of us would maybe MAYBE have one car pull up and turn around in our driveways.

It's typical liberal hate talk. And it's just talk, meant to intimidate. There's no actual force behind those words.
The ironic thing of course is that I'm a liberal and am used to that sort of cowardice from neo-Nazis. I got their panties in a wad by talking about their history of pedophilia. They even posted what they thought were maps to my house.

My response: "You think you know where I live. How come you're not here yet? Too damned stupid to follow your own directions, or just too damned scared?"
 
Shoot me with what?

If his initial tweet was to shoot supporters of pro-gun groups, then it is easily understood that these people would be supporters of anti-gun groups, everyone gets this, right.
So what it gods name are they goint to shoot us with, a sling shot, come on.
This guy is just an idiot trying to get the NRA to act in a negative manner for his own ends.
 
IMO the NRA is just waiting a week before issuing a statement to be extra-respectful of all the families in Newtown CT dealing with this recent tragic loss
 
I think the NRA was waiting to one, be as respectful as they could and two, ensure they say the right things.
 
Let me get this straight. They adovocate gun violence against NRA members and other pro-gun groups but are anti-gun? I just love convoluted liberal logic and the fact that this is not covered by the MSM, big big big surpirse! These idiots making these empty threats have probably never even touched a pellet gun and don't know which end is the muzzle so we'd have a rash of NDs. Violence against gun owners (members of the NRA and other pro-gun groups), well, that's just beyond stupid even if it is a "joke" (I'm not seeing the humor). Even felons know it's stupid. Haven't we seen how impressionable people are? If these idiots keep making comments like this, who knows what some nut will do. I'd give them my address but it's about as pointless as trying to debate gun control with Dianne Feinstein. They wouldn't dare break into the home of an armed citizen nor would they attack one in public unless they have a death wish.
 
And they say that NRA members are the violent ones? The only folks I've ever heard members talk about shooting were bad guys who attack others first.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
49,523
Messages
610,665
Members
74,995
Latest member
tripguru365
Back
Top