We've sold a number of them to people who want a glovebox gun.When I locate a dealer in my area it is just up the road from me, at a private residence. I have to remember this is how companies get started.
Maybe I need to invite this guy to the range to try out the gun.
I've had one for quite some time now and have put close to 800 rounds through it. It operates flawlessly with brass cased ammo. Mine just does not like steel cased ammo.
It is very accurate for a personal defense pistol, giving me 3.5" 10 shot groups at 25 yards. I am in the Branson, MO area. If anyone wants to try it out, get hold of me, buy your ammo and we can head to the range.
We've sold a number of them to people who want a glovebox gun.
From the youtube videos I've seen, they look comparable, but that is no benchmark.What is the recoil like compared to the Ruger LC9 and the Kel-Tek PF-9?
I found the Kel-Tek to be almost uncontrollable. I have never had a weapon just about pull itself out of my hands.
People that have them haven't complained but I wonder how much they really have shot them.What is the recoil like compared to the Ruger LC9 and the Kel-Tek PF-9?
I found the Kel-Tek to be almost uncontrollable. I have never had a weapon just about pull itself out of my hands.
[
What is the recoil like compared to the Ruger LC9 and the Kel-Tek PF-9?
I found the Kel-Tek to be almost uncontrollable. I have never had a weapon just about pull itself out of my hands.
Only problem is that it's an SCCY..their quality control is almost worst than Taurus.
Thanks for the comparo blues...The SCCY and the Kel-Tec P11 are very nearly identical, which is no surprise since SCCY was started by employees who left Kel-Tec to go out on their own.
SCCY CPX 2:
![]()
Kel-Tec P11:
![]()
It almost looks like the SCCY guys absconded with the lower poly molds and just cut some finger grooves into them. The back-strap radii and the contours of the front molding below the barrel are indistinguishable to the naked eye (if at all).
There's a little more mass to the CPX and the P11 vs. the PF9, and there are mags and/or mag-mods to put an extra round in and get that pinky finger extension that the SCCY comes stock with. The grip is a little fatter too, so either the SCCY or the P11 would be slightly less uncomfortable to shoot than the PF9. Some versions of the SCCY (maybe all?) have an external safety, which can adversely effect comfort depending how one carries.
I have a PF9 and limit my shooting time with it to only four or five mags per range visit. It's not a fun gun to shoot by any means, but it is a freakin' joy to carry no matter where or how I carry it. I wouldn't have any issue with carrying either the CPX (1 or 2) or the P11, but both of them have more girth and heft to them, and I already have a comparable weapon that I am very happy with (CZ 2075 RAMI). Neither the SCCY nor the P11 are going to be high-round-count shooters, but either should last and function fine under moderate practice/use.
Blues