Best case of pot calling the kettle black I've ever seen!


So the whole watching what you say.... like lying? Like all he did the entire campaign? Yea at least Perry is standing for his beliefs and speaking his true feelings. We need an honest man in office and the person running the armed forces should have served so he knows wht the heck is happening.
 

BigSlick

New member
So the whole watching what you say.... like lying? Like all he did the entire campaign? Yea at least Perry is standing for his beliefs and speaking his true feelings. We need an honest man in office and the person running the armed forces should have served so he knows wht the heck is happening.

That's why we need Ron Paul!
 
Oh i know. If he does end up runnin against NObama i will vote for him.(i would prolly vote for whoever ran against him, unless i thought he was the antichrist or gonna be worse than him)
 

BC1

,
Paul and Bachmann 2012
Perry / Bachman. I think Paul is already finished. Americans won't vote for a candidate who will legalize drugs, blame the U.S. for Iran and provide a jury trial to a foreign terrorist.
 
Perry / Bachman. I think Paul is already finished. Americans won't vote for a candidate who will legalize drugs, blame the U.S. for Iran and provide a jury trial to a foreign terrorist.[/QUOTE
BC1: But all of that is true.
Best way to win the drug war and generate tax revenue is to legalize MJ and tax it.
We actively supported a dictatorial regime in Iran, supported Iraq/Saddam when the Muslims took over Iran and are now paying the price for all of that mismanagement.
What's wrong with a jury trial for ANYONE? Our legal system is the gold standard for the rest of the world, and if it works for us it will work for terrorists as well.
Ron Paul has the answers - just need folks like yourself to stop and listen to them.
 

Derby

New member
I think Paul is already finished. Americans won't vote for a candidate who will legalize drugs, blame the U.S. for Iran and provide a jury trial to a foreign terrorist.

In other words you think Americans won't vote for a candidate who follows the US Constitution, which he is required to take an oath to support in order to serve. Study the history of the United States interference throughout the Middle East and you will see why Dr. Paul makes the accurate statements he does.

Perry is the governor who mandated all 11 year old girls to take a vaccine that would be of no value to anyone not sexually active (if even then). He pushed the Trans-Texas highway (the NAFTA highway) which is part of the UN agenda. That same agenda will be, if they get their way, taking away your firearms in the near future.
 

BC1

,
In other words you think Americans won't vote for a candidate who follows the US Constitution, which he is required to take an oath to support in order to serve. Study the history of the United States interference throughout the Middle East and you will see why Dr. Paul makes the accurate statements he does.

Perry is the governor who mandated all 11 year old girls to take a vaccine that would be of no value to anyone not sexually active (if even then). He pushed the Trans-Texas highway (the NAFTA highway) which is part of the UN agenda. That same agenda will be, if they get their way, taking away your firearms in the near future.
No. His strict constructionist view of the constitution is the main quality I admire in him. I just think that many Americans won't vote for him over the position of trying foreign terrorists in American courts. These aren't U.S. citizens and should have no constitutional protections. Additionally, a court trial requires the admission of evidence obtained through sources and techniques that are crucial to national security. Such intelligence gathering sources/techniques should never be presented to the world.

I want to see a candidate who can beat Obama. I don't think he can.
 

BeauRyker

New member
In other words you think Americans won't vote for a candidate who follows the US Constitution, which he is required to take an oath to support in order to serve.

Working out for Odumbo, isn't it? He probably uses a copy for toilet paper.
 

BeauRyker

New member
.

Perry is the governor who mandated all 11 year old girls to take a vaccine that would be of no value to anyone not sexually active (if even then). He pushed the Trans-Texas highway (the NAFTA highway) which is part of the UN agenda. That same agenda will be, if they get their way, taking away your firearms in the near future.

Good grief!!!!!!!!!!!!!:cray:

Derby, your guy is done. Get over it. Decent citizens WILL NOT vote to legalize drugs.
 

nogods

Active member
I'm not a Ron Paul supporter, but I can respect him because he addresses issues on an intellectually level. He respects the intelligence of the audience rather than insulting it with inane statements. The same can't be said for Rick Perry.
 

NCGunDude

New member
Oh i know. If he does end up runnin against NObama i will vote for him.(i would prolly vote for whoever ran against him, unless i thought he was the antichrist or gonna be worse than him)

There aren't too many people who will bring up the anti christ, but you're exactly correct. It's difficult figuring out who they are, though. Bush, I think, was a dupe. Cheney, in the other hand, I'm not so sure. They all run in the same circles, and Bush sure stabbed the US in back with TARP. I've even had perfectly normal people talking about 9/11 being a US conspiracy. Obama and Biden are both dupes. Hillary Clinton, on the other hand...

It's always difficult to figure out who the anti-christs are, but as John said, even now, there are many anti christs among us. Thanks for mentioning it, I tend to forget sometimes as I go about my day. We need to be about our father's business, too! Bless!
 

Derby

New member
Prohibition was legal in that the 18th amendment gave the Federal Government the right to outlaw it. Then the people saw how unwise it was because of bootlegging and the associated crime and mobs. So they wised up and passed the 21st amendment to legalize that particular drug. The Federal Government has no Constitutional authorization for its laws against drugs.

Every venture away from the Constitution that we allow the government, makes it that much easier for the next one to go unchallenged. Drugs could always be regulated by any state or local government that had no constitutional block to doing so. Personally, I have no use for drugs. I don't even like to take prescriptions or OTC drugs.

Drug use is one of many victimless crimes that should not be on the books, much like the victimless crime of owning and carrying a gun without going through the many hoops that various level of government require.
 

twogunwilly

American
I'm not a Ron Paul supporter, but I can respect him because he addresses issues on an intellectually level. He respects the intelligence of the audience rather than insulting it with inane statements. The same can't be said for Rick Perry.
You like Obuma, we get it. Afraid of Perry?
 

Derby

New member
No. His strict constructionist view of the constitution is the main quality I admire in him. I just think that many Americans won't vote for him over the position of trying foreign terrorists in American courts. These aren't U.S. citizens and should have no constitutional protections. Additionally, a court trial requires the admission of evidence obtained through sources and techniques that are crucial to national security. Such intelligence gathering sources/techniques should never be presented to the world.

I want to see a candidate who can beat Obama. I don't think he can.

If the people in question are arrested in the US, they should have the citizens rights until a court rules they do not qualify. If they were arrested elsewhere, in all probability we had no right to make such an arrest as we had no authority in the other country.

Can Paul beat Obama? Who knows? But as long as the voters assume that he can't, it will become a self-fulfilling prophecy. Check out the results of the Iowa straw poll (the actual results -- not the sound bites which ignore Paul) and the polls where Paul was compared with Obama.
 

BC1

,
If the people in question are arrested in the US, they should have the citizens rights until a court rules they do not qualify. If they were arrested elsewhere, in all probability we had no right to make such an arrest as we had no authority in the other country.
Consider a terrorist attack against our military or businesses abroad in a country (such as Japan) who wants our presence. Should that terrorist be brought to America for a jury trial?
 

New Threads

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
49,390
Messages
623,096
Members
74,214
Latest member
Death
Top