Beau
I was never here.
Should there be background checks?
Please vote and share.
Poll - EasyPolls.net
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk
Please vote and share.
Poll - EasyPolls.net
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk
Occasionally the NICS check will flag one so at an FFL only. Between two people who are not FFLs can not be enforced.
So when we got a denial recently and they requested the buyer's address they didn't follow through? Denials are rare but when one comes up, there normally is a reason. "Conditional No" is not a denial. It is only a delay. A CN can still be sold by the FFL after 3 days if there isn't a "Denied". That is at the discretion of the FFL.Most NICS hits are false. But suppose you are correct that every once in a while it produces an actual hit, you have to assume that;
1) Said person knew they were prohibited and was trying to obtain a firearm illegally and on purpose.
2) They planned to use the firearm for a nefarious purpose.
3) They were unable to obtain a firearm by any other means either before or after they were denied.
4) They were arrested for trying to purchase said firearm.
Unless these things are true then the NICS system accomplished nothing.
I live in Idaho, and I have a CPL, so when I buy a gun from a dealer no back ground check is required. Just do the paper work, pay for it, and walk out the door with my new gun. I voted for #1 because back ground checks do little to nothing to stop someone from doing something bad if they really want to with a gun.
If anyone knows the answer to this since I've just posted what most probably see as ridiculous, just how far back do CCP background checks actually go? Here in Alabama it's a whole 'nuther Country and everything is about the money when it comes to Sheriffs' Departments. It's been 35 years since I was arrested for a couple of misdemeanors but in this podunk County that would be enough for my Sheriff to deny my CCP. Anybody know how far back they go?
MADD - Statistics
Every day in America, another 28 people die as a result of drunk driving crashes.
Drunk driving costs the United States $199 billion a year.
About one-third of all drivers arrested or convicted of drunk driving are repeat offenders.
So where is the cry for background checks on vehicle sales? Why is there not a Federal dealer's license required for vehicle dealers? Why are out of state vehicle purchases allowed with no extra hoops to jump through? Why are those convicted of drunk driving not prohibited from ever purchasing or being in possession of a vehicle? And that's not including those killed in vehicle crashes caused by actions such as running stoplights/signs and speeding.
Howdy,
The reason the background checks rarely have a "hit" is because people the cannot legally buy a gun NEVER go to a licensed dealer to buy a gun.
All you have to do is go to a local gun show and look at all the people that are buying from "private collections" and notice how the price of the gun is more expensive for a used gun than a brand new one.
Also at the last gun show that I attended in Little Rock there were several non-white males that were having white females purchase handguns for them.
None of the non-white males could legally buy a gun so they had another person buy it for them.
Since these non-white males could not legally buy or own a gun, what are the chances that the guns they were buying would be used in a crime?
Just curious.
Eventhough I do NOT want my Rights or Your Rights infringed upon, some where, some how, the guns need to be kept out of the hands of people who can NOT legally own one.
Paul