Take a gander at this link and see if you can tell the difference.
Bumper Sticker Of The Day? | The Last Refuge
Bumper Sticker Of The Day? | The Last Refuge
As long as we are talking about Connecticut
- Thread starter JimTh
- Start date
nontechguy
New member
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
Seamsealer
Member
There should be laws preventing this sort of thing.(sarcasm)
BluesStringer
Les Brers
There are. One is called the 2nd Amendment. But since too few Americans are willing to take that route, the only other "law" that should be applied is divorce law. A good friend wrote the following, which I believe is where the link in the OP got the pictures. Re-published here in its entirety with permission from the author of Sword At The Ready Blog:
It’s Time For A Divorce And To Separate Ourselves From Federal Tyranny
What’s left of liberty in America faces a choice: subjugation to Collectivist tyranny, bloodshed in resistance, or going our separate ways.
January 2, 2014 · 12:03 pm
What’s left of liberty in America faces a choice: subjugation to Collectivist tyranny, bloodshed in resistance, or going our separate ways.
The time has come for a divorce from Ruling Class Collectivism and tyranny. You will hear the argument that this was tried before and is a non-starter. Well, refusing to consider a divorce means you agree to be subjugated, abused, raped, pillaged and every aspect of your life regulated by MarxoFascist government.
Walter E. Williams has an excellent argument about why separation is necessary. Where I disagree with his assessment is the historical fact that NO TYRANNY EVER ALLOWS THEIR PEOPLE A SEPARATION. Never. Not without massive bloodshed in the all-out effort to eliminate and destroy those who want to escape government tyranny and live in peace. The DHS stockpiling 1.6 billion rounds of hollow-point ammunition, staging thousands of MRAPS and armed APCS throughout the country might indicate that the federal regime under Obama is ready for any resistance to their tyrannical rule.
America’s Independence and Liberty from British tyranny began when enough Colonists agreed that a separation from England was necessary. Like every government tyranny in history – the Crown sent troops to put down the ‘rebellion’ by force and a long, bloody, violent war to be free took place. When the British troops came to disarm the colonists, the first shots in a violent revolution for freedom began.
Today however, when the State disarms it’s people by Constitution-violating laws – the people line up to register their guns which will soon be confiscated as happened every single time ‘registration’ has transpired. One a people are disarmed, genocides always happen by the very government who disarmed them.
Walter E. Williams has an excellent argument about why separation is necessary. Where I disagree with his assessment is the historical fact that NO TYRANNY EVER ALLOWS THEIR PEOPLE A SEPARATION. Never. Not without massive bloodshed in the all-out effort to eliminate and destroy those who want to escape government tyranny and live in peace. The DHS stockpiling 1.6 billion rounds of hollow-point ammunition, staging thousands of MRAPS and armed APCS throughout the country might indicate that the federal regime under Obama is ready for any resistance to their tyrannical rule.
America’s Independence and Liberty from British tyranny began when enough Colonists agreed that a separation from England was necessary. Like every government tyranny in history – the Crown sent troops to put down the ‘rebellion’ by force and a long, bloody, violent war to be free took place. When the British troops came to disarm the colonists, the first shots in a violent revolution for freedom began.
Today however, when the State disarms it’s people by Constitution-violating laws – the people line up to register their guns which will soon be confiscated as happened every single time ‘registration’ has transpired. One a people are disarmed, genocides always happen by the very government who disarmed them.
We face nothing less. For if you want to be left alone in peace, it’s going to require you to accept the fact that if we want Liberty, we must separate ourselves from this Collectivist MarxoFascist government and those who want it – and prepare to fight for our right to be free of them. That means holding onto your weapons and refusing to hear the State-run media’s propaganda. An important step to keeping what is left of your liberty is understanding the necessity of divorcing ourselves from the Ruling Class in Washington and their Collectivists and Welfare leeches in this former Republic.
Walter E. Williams explains the necessity of a separation. He is most correct to say that we have reached the point in America where we have irreconcilable differences. A Divorce is necessary if we would be free.
Walter E. Williams explains the necessity of a separation. He is most correct to say that we have reached the point in America where we have irreconcilable differences. A Divorce is necessary if we would be free.
Parting Company
Here’s a question that I’ve asked in the past that needs to be revisited. Unless one wishes to obfuscate, it has a simple yes or no answer. If one group of people prefers strong government control and management of people’s lives while another group prefers liberty and desires to be left alone, should they be required to enter into conflict with one another and risk bloodshed and loss of life in order to impose their preferences on the other group? Yes or no. My answer is no; they should be able to peaceably part company and go their separate ways.
The problem our nation faces is very much like a marriage in which one partner has an established pattern of ignoring and breaking the marital vows. Moreover, the offending partner has no intention to mend his ways. Of course, the marriage can remain intact while one party tries to impose his will on the other and engages in the deviousness of one-upsmanship and retaliation. Rather than domination or submission by one party, or domestic violence, a more peaceable alternative is separation.
I believe our nation is at a point where there are enough irreconcilable differences between those Americans who want to control other Americans and those Americans who want to be left alone that separation is the only peaceable alternative. Just as in a marriage where vows are broken, our rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution have been grossly violated by a government instituted to protect them. These constitutional violations have increased independent of whether there’s been a Democrat-controlled Washington or a Republican-controlled Washington.
There is no evidence that Americans who are responsible for and support constitutional abrogation have any intention of mending their ways. You say, “Williams, what do you mean by constitutional abrogation?” Let’s look at the magnitude of the violations.
Article I, Section 8 of our Constitution lists the activities for which Congress is authorized to tax and spend. Nowhere on that list is there authority for Congress to tax and spend for: Medicare, Social Security, public education, farm subsidies, bank and business bailouts, food stamps and thousands of other activities that account for roughly two-thirds of the federal budget.
Neither is there authority for congressional mandates to citizens about what type of health insurance they must purchase, how states and people may use their land, the speed at which they can drive, whether a library has wheelchair ramps, and the gallons of water used per toilet flush. The list of congressional violations of both the letter and spirit of the Constitution is virtually without end. Our derelict Supreme Court has given Congress sanction to do just about anything for which they can muster a majority vote.
James Madison, the acknowledged father of the Constitution, explained in Federalist Paper No. 45: “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce. … The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives and liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement and prosperity of the State.” Our founder’s constitutional vision of limited federal government has been consigned to the dustbin of history.
Americans have several options. We can like sheep submit to those who have contempt for liberty and our Constitution. We can resist, fight and risk bloodshed and death in an attempt to force America’s tyrants to respect our liberties and Constitution. A superior alternative is to find a way to peaceably separate into states whose citizens respect liberty and the Constitution. My personal preference is a restoration of the constitutional values of limited government that made us a great nation.
Here’s a question that I’ve asked in the past that needs to be revisited. Unless one wishes to obfuscate, it has a simple yes or no answer. If one group of people prefers strong government control and management of people’s lives while another group prefers liberty and desires to be left alone, should they be required to enter into conflict with one another and risk bloodshed and loss of life in order to impose their preferences on the other group? Yes or no. My answer is no; they should be able to peaceably part company and go their separate ways.
The problem our nation faces is very much like a marriage in which one partner has an established pattern of ignoring and breaking the marital vows. Moreover, the offending partner has no intention to mend his ways. Of course, the marriage can remain intact while one party tries to impose his will on the other and engages in the deviousness of one-upsmanship and retaliation. Rather than domination or submission by one party, or domestic violence, a more peaceable alternative is separation.
I believe our nation is at a point where there are enough irreconcilable differences between those Americans who want to control other Americans and those Americans who want to be left alone that separation is the only peaceable alternative. Just as in a marriage where vows are broken, our rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution have been grossly violated by a government instituted to protect them. These constitutional violations have increased independent of whether there’s been a Democrat-controlled Washington or a Republican-controlled Washington.
There is no evidence that Americans who are responsible for and support constitutional abrogation have any intention of mending their ways. You say, “Williams, what do you mean by constitutional abrogation?” Let’s look at the magnitude of the violations.
Article I, Section 8 of our Constitution lists the activities for which Congress is authorized to tax and spend. Nowhere on that list is there authority for Congress to tax and spend for: Medicare, Social Security, public education, farm subsidies, bank and business bailouts, food stamps and thousands of other activities that account for roughly two-thirds of the federal budget.
Neither is there authority for congressional mandates to citizens about what type of health insurance they must purchase, how states and people may use their land, the speed at which they can drive, whether a library has wheelchair ramps, and the gallons of water used per toilet flush. The list of congressional violations of both the letter and spirit of the Constitution is virtually without end. Our derelict Supreme Court has given Congress sanction to do just about anything for which they can muster a majority vote.
James Madison, the acknowledged father of the Constitution, explained in Federalist Paper No. 45: “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce. … The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives and liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement and prosperity of the State.” Our founder’s constitutional vision of limited federal government has been consigned to the dustbin of history.
Americans have several options. We can like sheep submit to those who have contempt for liberty and our Constitution. We can resist, fight and risk bloodshed and death in an attempt to force America’s tyrants to respect our liberties and Constitution. A superior alternative is to find a way to peaceably separate into states whose citizens respect liberty and the Constitution. My personal preference is a restoration of the constitutional values of limited government that made us a great nation.
Divorce law is what needs to be implemented. We are no longer the United States of America, we are the Divided States of America. Might as well make the division official and get a divorce.
Blues
BluesStringer
Les Brers
If I'm not mistaken, yes, arms must now be registered in CT. But I know for a fact that what's worse, is ammo is heavily restricted by the new law which makes it much harder for retailers to even have shipments delivered to their businesses.
Shortly after CT tyrants passed the law requiring all these hoops for gun owners and retailers to jump through, Mike Vanderboegh, owner of Sipsey Street Irregulars, took a trip up there to make the following speech at a rally opposing the new law, the fact that the rally was a day late and a dollar short notwithstanding. Mike introduced himself thusly, "I'm Mike Vanderboegh.....and I'm a smuggler." The rest of the speech explains what he meant by saying he was a smuggler, and no, it wasn't a rhetorical reference or empty puffery, but he says towards the end that the ammo restrictions go into effect in "July," so I think the paperwork requirements that retailers will drown under went into effect on New Year's Day, even the though the restrictions went into effect six months ago. Anyway, what Mike says he's going to do on that July day when the new law takes effect, starts around 13:15 or so on to the end of the speech. It's some priceless stuff, and anyone contemplating taking on the government must be, at a minimum, tell tyrants these kinds of things to their faces.
New Threads
-
-
Mystic Seaport Museum, Shelburne Museum Vermont
- Started by Harry45255
- Replies: 0
-
-
Reloading Newbie Here—What’s the Real Cost Advantage?
- Started by michaelstrahan
- Replies: 4
-
Members online
No members online now.
