Ar-15

ITCH

New member
Well Well talk about some BS on the News. Obama doesn't want you to have "Assault Weapons" but here in Nashville TN police will soon be carrying AR-15's in there patrol cars. Really and you want our tax to pay for this. LMFAO
 
And I should be able to carry a patrol carbine too, so where does that leave us? Well at least here in AZ I can for now
 
I don't have any problem with Law Enforcement carrying AR-15s provided that those who aren't Law Enforcement are afforded the same right. The police do not live in a war zone nor do they patrol a war zone. They walk to the same streets as every other United States citizen and, while they do put themselves in harms way more often, we are subject to the same dangers as they.
 
Please guys, read the stuff...... Obama, Feinstien, etc...... are NO LONGER saying "assault rilfes"..... they are saying "assault weapons" . This includes any gun (including shotguns & handguns) ... originally designed for the military (would include 1911's, M9's, etc), and any handgun, shotgun, or rifle with a feature used by the military ..... Now think hard about that. How many handguns .. like Glocks, XD's, PF9's, .380's, etc. have a rail on them for adding a flashlight or laser...... they would be included in the ban. They specifically say "ANY " gun with any kind of a rail on it would be included in the ban
.

Any Mossberg 500's with pistol grips, foreward grips, etc. would be banned .... along with any that has any type of rail. They were arguing about whether "slings" were for military use.... and if it had the capability of putting on a sling..... but don't know if that got included or not, didn't see it... so appears they left that off (not sure).
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
49,523
Messages
610,662
Members
74,992
Latest member
RedDotArmsTraining
Back
Top