I Am a newcomer to gun ownership, only within the last 5 years. Being new I see myself favoring polymer for it's lighter weight, excellent durability, and alleged recoil absorbing flex properties. As such many of these guns are striker fired such as my Glock and XD. when I compare them in store to hammer fired ones like the Sig 226 or HK USP among others I don't like the longer trigger pull. I don't know if it's cause they're SA/DA or even the DAO ones, they don't feel as good as striker ones.
Even some striker fired models feel cheap to me, so maybe it's model specific. But while the only pistol I own that is hammer fired is my KelTec 380, I can't see myself buying a hammer fired pistol unless it was a 1911, as those are seemingly the only pistol whose trigger pull is satisfactory to me, obviously due to the short SA pull, now if only they came in polymer... I know that's heresy, but why haven't any manufacturers gone that route?
Even some striker fired models feel cheap to me, so maybe it's model specific. But while the only pistol I own that is hammer fired is my KelTec 380, I can't see myself buying a hammer fired pistol unless it was a 1911, as those are seemingly the only pistol whose trigger pull is satisfactory to me, obviously due to the short SA pull, now if only they came in polymer... I know that's heresy, but why haven't any manufacturers gone that route?