Anti-Gun Facebook Policy changes

I've seen that all over Facebook the past couple of days about the gun-based pages. But I have yet to see anything that is actually credible or from Facebook itself. There are always a lot of rumors like that floating around that never come to pass. Right now Zuckerberg is obsessed with trying to get amnesty passed. And although he's a far left wing liberal, he's not really an anti-gun fanatic.
 
Here it is: https://newsroom.fb.com/News/814/Facebook-Instagram-Announce-New-Educational-and-Enforcement-Measures-for-Commercial-Activity. The policy change includes the following:

Today, we are introducing a series of new educational and enforcement efforts for people discussing the private sale of regulated items:

- Any time we receive a report on Facebook about a post promoting the private sale of a commonly regulated item, we will send a message to that person reminding him or her to comply with relevant laws and regulations. We will also limit access to that post to people over the age of 18.

- We will require Pages that are primarily used by people to promote the private sale of commonly regulated goods or services to include language that clearly reminds people of the importance of understanding and complying with relevant laws and regulations, and limit access to people over the age of 18 or older if required by applicable law.

- We will provide special in-app education on Instagram for those who search for sales or promotions of firearms.

- We will not permit people to post offers to sell regulated items that indicate a willingness to evade or help others evade the law. For example, private sellers of firearms in the U.S. will not be permitted to specify “no background check required,” nor can they offer to transact across state lines without a licensed firearms dealer.

We have worked with a number of individuals and organizations on the development of these efforts, which will be implemented and enforced in the coming weeks. We are grateful in particular for the advice offered by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, Americans for Responsible Solutions, Sandy Hook Promise, Mayors Against Illegal Guns, and Moms Demand Action, which helped us develop an approach for the private sale of firearms. We also appreciate the feedback provided by the Facebook Safety Advisory Board.

So, if you want to sell guns on Facebook, you still can. Just don't explicitly state "no background check required". It is not exactly the policy change that the Moms Demand Action propaganda machinery wants everyone make believe.

Now, this policy change still bothers me, because there simply is no background check required for in-state firearms transfers in many states. Facebook also did only consult gun control advocates and no firearms or shooting sports associations.

Read NSSF's statement here: NSSF Statement on Facebook Firearms Policy | NSSF Blog

Read NRA's statement here: NRA-ILA | NRA Response to Facebook Policy Change
 

moms and illegal mayors against guns DIDN'T get what they wanted. Another EPIC FAIL for the anti-second amendment movement along with Staples telling Moms Against Guns to take their petition and leave the property. all gun discussion groups will be hanging around on facebook and instagram.:nhl_checking::dirol::happy:
 
I liked the quote from Prof. Adam Winkler of UCLA, a "gun control expert," in the CBS News report:

"It's mostly a symbolic victory," said Winkler. "It's not going to significantly reduce gun sales. It's not going to significantly reduce access to guns by criminals..."

Now, here's the part of his quote that lets us know that our efforts to fight gun control have had an effect:

"But gun control advocates could use any victory they can get these days. Even if it's only a symbolic one."

Under pressure, Facebook announces major gun policy changes - CBS News

Actually, this is a victory for Second Amendment speech, but we cannot afford to let our guard down. These groups have gone on the offensive.
 
Well, as for me and my family, we have deleted our Facebook accounts today in favor of the new Christian Facebook. The original is just too filthy and a waste of our time. I do not care if that rich owner of FB is pro/con anything it is just way over rated. We had snail mail and three channel tv long before that kid was even born. So, more time on this site.
 
Here it is: https://newsroom.fb.com/News/814/Facebook-Instagram-Announce-New-Educational-and-Enforcement-Measures-for-Commercial-Activity. The policy change includes the following:



So, if you want to sell guns on Facebook, you still can. Just don't explicitly state "no background check required". It is not exactly the policy change that the Moms Demand Action propaganda machinery wants everyone make believe.

Now, this policy change still bothers me, because there simply is no background check required for in-state firearms transfers in many states. Facebook also did only consult gun control advocates and no firearms or shooting sports associations.

Read NSSF's statement here: NSSF Statement on Facebook Firearms Policy | NSSF Blog

Read NRA's statement here: NRA-ILA | NRA Response to Facebook Policy Change

According to the NRA, they were involved and their involvement kept FB from give "mayors against gun" and "mother demand action..." Everything they wanted. Of course the liberal media aren't going to credit the NRA with anything. And the liberal media is chalking this up as a win for "mothers......". But on other social forums (twitter, etc.) the mothers are ticked off because they didn't get no where near what they wanted, which was a total ban of all things guns on FB!
 
Is this legit? If so what can we do about it?

FB is a private company and can pretty much do whatever they want as far as policies as long as they don't discriminate against a "protected group". Pro-gun or anti-gun groups are not protected. If you feel strongly enough about something, all you can do is boycott FB, or better yet, contact the companies they advertise and tell them you will boycott their products is FB does something to offend your beliefs.

The NRA credited themselves by keeping the policy changes reasonable and that has something to do with their 3 million FB likes verses "mayors against gun" 20k FB likes.
 
I liked the quote from Prof. Adam Winkler of UCLA, a "gun control expert," in the CBS News report:



Now, here's the part of his quote that lets us know that our efforts to fight gun control have had an effect:



Actually, this is a victory for Second Amendment speech, but we cannot afford to let our guard down. These groups have gone on the offensive.

a victory for 1st and 2nd amendment protection,but i do agree that we should stay vigilant and stay aware of these attacks from the leftist guerillas. also pass the word to the managers of your local Staples stores to have any and all Moms Demand Gun Bans protestors removed from the property. I have alerted mine and you all should do the same.:dirol::shout:
 
I never did Facebook or Twitter. Never will. :smile:

When my sister passed away I joined FB long enough to find some long-lost family friends and high school chums. Stayed on about 3 or 4 weeks and then started the process of deleting my account. It takes about two months to close the account.
Roll_Eyes_Smiley_by_Mirz123-1.gif


Otherwise, consider this folks: "Social" media is the #1 source for data mining by both the government and private concerns, such as employers. If an employer can find you online, they can consider hiring (or firing I suppose) or not hiring you on the basis of information they wouldn't be allowed to ask you about in an interview. So many people join those sites with their real names, and then post pictures, videos and textual descriptions of all manner of debauchery that they engage in in private life. It's amazing anyone on those sites gets hired at all.

I'm not saying that giving a "Like" to the N R A or any other political organization is a good reason to deny employment or for government to keep closer tabs on you, but I am saying it can and does happen, and that even the most boring, no-life folks on the planet could be judged worthy of further scrutiny on information that they themselves put out there. Not sure why anyone thinks being a part of such a "social" circle is a good idea.

Blues
 
That would bother me if I ever used facebook. It bothers me that they are as anti firearm as they seem to be.
 
That would bother me if I ever used facebook. It bothers me that they are as anti firearm as they seem to be.


Actually, it was a fairly reasonable response from FB. Check out The Firearms Show article; helps to put it into perspective.

Link Removed
 

New Threads

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
49,525
Messages
610,668
Members
74,995
Latest member
tripguru365
Back
Top