A-rated Representative gets a D from me.
I recently sent a letter to Rep Max Thornberry and Senator John Cornyn, both of Texas. The letter consisted of sample legislation that I received from the Tenth Amendment Center. The sample legislation had already been corrected to read State of Texas where appropriate, and would nullify in Texas every federal firearms regulation that had ever been passed, simply because they are illegal regulations (infringement - which goes against the Constitution).
Today I received an answer from Max. Not one mention of the sample legislation. Just the normal condescending political letter that is designed to appease the dissatisfaction of the common man.
Two quotes from his letter: "I do not know the answer, and I do not know if anyone knows the answer yet. I believe the problem is much deeper and more complex than any of the current proposals contemplate. I am concerned that in a rush to do something, there may be an overreaction. We need to take a more thoughtful approach and look at all of the facts in order to avoid unintended consequences." And then, "The Second Amendment to the Constitution establishes a citizen's right to keep and bear arms. I think it is wrong to restrict the self defense rights of law-abiding citizens in support of a policy that does not work. Therefore, we should look to other measures--perhaps within the government, but also within our families, churches, and cultural institutions--for answers."
First off, he seems to not understand that the Constitution did not establish the right for us to keep and bear arms. It recognizes the right.
Secondly, was not the sample letter of legislation a current proposal? It would certainly solve the problems of the gun-free killing-fields in Texas.
Third, this letter makes it appear that he doesn't seem to be one that will stand up for his constituents. Sad. I hope John Cornyn will be different.
I recently sent a letter to Rep Max Thornberry and Senator John Cornyn, both of Texas. The letter consisted of sample legislation that I received from the Tenth Amendment Center. The sample legislation had already been corrected to read State of Texas where appropriate, and would nullify in Texas every federal firearms regulation that had ever been passed, simply because they are illegal regulations (infringement - which goes against the Constitution).
Today I received an answer from Max. Not one mention of the sample legislation. Just the normal condescending political letter that is designed to appease the dissatisfaction of the common man.
Two quotes from his letter: "I do not know the answer, and I do not know if anyone knows the answer yet. I believe the problem is much deeper and more complex than any of the current proposals contemplate. I am concerned that in a rush to do something, there may be an overreaction. We need to take a more thoughtful approach and look at all of the facts in order to avoid unintended consequences." And then, "The Second Amendment to the Constitution establishes a citizen's right to keep and bear arms. I think it is wrong to restrict the self defense rights of law-abiding citizens in support of a policy that does not work. Therefore, we should look to other measures--perhaps within the government, but also within our families, churches, and cultural institutions--for answers."
First off, he seems to not understand that the Constitution did not establish the right for us to keep and bear arms. It recognizes the right.
Secondly, was not the sample letter of legislation a current proposal? It would certainly solve the problems of the gun-free killing-fields in Texas.
Third, this letter makes it appear that he doesn't seem to be one that will stand up for his constituents. Sad. I hope John Cornyn will be different.